top of page
Search

Whether Abstract Essential Names can Stand for the Person?

Thank you for subscribing to Annotated Thomist...check back each day for a new section of St. Thomas' corpus, annotated and summarized. (FREE TRIAL FOR NEW SUBSCRIBERS!!!)


AT is also available to donors of $10 or more on Patreon along with all of the other benefits (daily bonus videos, bonus articles, PDFs, etc.


If you need more personalized help reading the Summa, I am available for 1-on-1 sessions, here.



cf., Sent.I.D5.Q1.A1-2, QDeUni.A1.Rep12, Graecorum.Part1.C4, Decretalem.II


Here, we must take the negative position. For, unlike above, the mode of signification here is the abstract and therefore does not signify the deity as concretely subsisting, whether in its absolute subsistence (thus we say "God creates") or in its relative subsistence (thus we say that "God begets"). For, the term "Deity" lends itself to signifying the essence and not the person, just as humanity lends itself to signify human nature in abstract and man signifies the human as concretely subsisting. 

Want to read more?

Subscribe to christianbwagner.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

6 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page